KINGFISHER: Fast Personalized Visual Autoregressive Generation via Scale-Aware Prompt-Conditioned Scale Decomposition

A model-tuning-free framework that decomposes early autoregressive scale codes into content and style components, recomposes them as a compact semantic prefix, and lets a frozen visual autoregressive generator complete the remaining scales.

1University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

2Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

3National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan

†Co-supervising

‡Corresponding author

Paper coming soon Code coming soon BibTeX
54x faster pair-specific preparation than diffusion-based methods
7.5x faster than VAR-based alternatives
0 model tuning, LoRA modules, adapters, or learned subject embeddings

Overview

Personalization directly in native scale space.

Personalized image generation has been extensively studied in diffusion models, often relying on subject-specific optimization of model weights, textual embeddings, LoRA modules, or adapters. KINGFISHER explores a different direction for fast personalization in visual autoregressive models.

The key observation is that a short prefix of early autoregressive scale codes is sufficient to strongly determine object structure and global appearance, while later scales primarily refine the established generation trajectory. KINGFISHER decomposes early residual scale codes into content- and style-related components through prompt-conditioned scale-code subspaces, then recomposes them into a compact semantic prefix for coherent refinement by the frozen generator.

Content and appearance meet before generation unfolds.

Given two real images, KINGFISHER preserves the object-related structure of one image while transferring the visual appearance of another. Later scales are predicted with bitwise self-correction, producing a coherent personalized result without per-subject training.

KINGFISHER teaser showing content images, style references, and generated personalized results.
KINGFISHER recomposes early autoregressive scale codes from a content image and a style reference, then lets the frozen generator complete coherent later scales.
Scale-wise analysis comparing prefix reconstruction and prompt routing across residual scales.
Early residual scales act as compact semantic anchors; later scales mainly refine details along the trajectory already set by the prefix.

Scale-Wise Insight

A short early prefix controls semantics.

Prefix reconstruction and prompt routing show that object identity, shape, color, and global appearance are dominated by the earliest consecutive residual scales.

Proposed Method

Prompt-conditioned scale decomposition.

Overview of the KINGFISHER pipeline from tokenizer encoding through prompt-conditioned decomposition and frozen autoregressive refinement.
The pipeline decomposes selected early residual codes into content, style, and residual factors, recomposes a compact prefix, then predicts the remaining scales with bitwise self-correction.
01

Build scale-code subspaces

Prompt-conditioned directions identify content-related and appearance-related structure inside early autoregressive residual scales.

02

Decompose early prefixes

Each early scale code is approximated as a composition of content, style, and residual information, separating factors before full synthesis.

03

Compose a semantic prefix

Content components from the source image and style components from the reference image are recombined into a compact prefix.

04

Refine with a frozen generator

The remaining scales are completed by the frozen visual autoregressive generator via bitwise self-correction.

Results

Fast preparation with strong alignment.

CSD-100 Evaluation

Experiments report strong content preservation and leading style and text alignment among evaluated methods.

Training-Free Personalization

KINGFISHER avoids model tuning, LoRA, adapters, and learned subject embeddings, making per-pair setup lightweight.

Scale-Wise Insight

Early scales govern object structure and global appearance; later scales mainly refine an already established generation path.

Qualitative comparison on CSD-100 showing content references, style references, baselines, and KINGFISHER results.
On CSD-100, KINGFISHER balances content preservation and style transfer across diverse content-style combinations without pair-specific model tuning.

Quantitative Results

Main comparison on CSD-100

KINGFISHER leads style alignment and text alignment while retaining strong content preservation across 500 ordered content-style pairs.

Method CSD-C CLIP-I CSD-S DINO CLIP-T
DreamBooth-LoRA 0.5519 0.7362 0.4207 0.3813 0.2492
B-LoRA 0.4739 0.7182 0.4990 0.4220 0.2683
UnZipLoRA 0.5782 0.7322 0.3673 0.3560 0.2472
Inspiration Tree 0.5413 0.7591 0.2897 0.2601 0.2565
CSD-VAR 0.4731 0.7184 0.2812 0.2503 0.2648
Kingfisher 0.5519 0.7900 0.5222 0.4350 0.3105

Efficiency and human preference

Preparation drops to 23.54 seconds per pair, and the blind study gives KINGFISHER the highest preference share.

Method Prep. Infer. Votes Pref.
DreamBooth-LoRA 1542.21s 11.98s 54 9.0%
B-LoRA 1309.00s 12.88s 168 28.0%
UnZipLoRA 3463.70s 11.83s 45 7.5%
Inspiration Tree 7465.36s 6.56s 39 6.5%
CSD-VAR 171.65s 1.39s 40 6.7%
Kingfisher 23.54s 1.61s 254 42.3%

Scale-wise role analysis

The first four residual scales nearly reconstruct the input, while prompt routing only shifts strongly when early ranges are routed.

Experiment Range CLIP-I DINO-I LPIPS CLIP-T
Prefix recon. R1 0.42 0.36 0.58 -
Prefix recon. R1:4 0.88 0.84 0.16 -
Prefix recon. R1:7 0.93 0.89 0.11 -
Prompt routing R10:13 - - - 0.28
Prompt routing R2:4 - - - 0.81
Prompt routing R1:5 - - - 0.84

Ablation Studies

Ablation of prefix composition variants at different beta values.
More rectified early scales strengthen appearance transfer; larger beta values bring more structure back from the content reference.

Prefix composition

The default [R1*, R2*, A3, R4*] keeps A3 as a semantic anchor, reaches the best CLIP-T score, and avoids the content drop caused by rectifying R3.

Structural correction beta

Higher beta improves CSD-C and CLIP-I but reduces CSD-S and DINO. We use beta = 0.5 as a balanced operating point.

Objective constraints

Removing style, content, reconstruction, or orthogonality terms weakens the trade-off; the full objective gives the most consistent balance.

Prefix composition

Configuration CSD-C CLIP-I CSD-S DINO CLIP-T
[A1, A2, A3, A4] 0.7774 0.9370 0.2922 0.2720 0.3017
[R1*, A2, A3, R4*] 0.6281 0.8392 0.4342 0.3751 0.3119
[R1*, R2*, A3, R4*] 0.5504 0.7922 0.5210 0.4367 0.3127
[R1*, R2*, R3*, R4*] 0.4979 0.7416 0.6156 0.5416 0.2959

Beta sensitivity

Beta CSD-C CLIP-I CSD-S DINO CLIP-T
0.00 0.5436 0.7784 0.5353 0.4597 0.3068
0.25 0.5471 0.7866 0.5333 0.4521 0.3104
0.50 0.5504 0.7922 0.5210 0.4367 0.3127
0.75 0.5551 0.7968 0.5161 0.4239 0.3130
1.00 0.5613 0.8027 0.5063 0.4096 0.3144

Loss constraints

Configuration CSD-C CLIP-I CSD-S DINO CLIP-T
w/o Lsty 0.5478 0.7895 0.4726 0.3914 0.3048
w/o Lalign 0.5127 0.7568 0.5073 0.4218 0.3035
w/o Lremove 0.5019 0.7446 0.4981 0.4127 0.3009
w/o Lrec 0.4742 0.7165 0.4386 0.3597 0.2863
w/o Lorth 0.5264 0.7698 0.4935 0.4062 0.3074
Full objective 0.5504 0.7922 0.5210 0.4367 0.3127

Citation

BibTeX

@misc{vo2027kingfisher,
  title  = {KINGFISHER: Fast Personalized Visual Autoregressive Generation via Scale-Aware Prompt-Conditioned Scale Decomposition},
  author = {Vo, Dinh-Khoi and Sugimoto, Akihiro and Tran, Minh-Triet and Le, Trung-Nghia},
  year   = {2027},
  note   = {Manuscript}
}